image by Brands&People

With Bitcoin turning the corner, one question that I’ve seen floating around the past week is:

“So how do we get to $100k?”

There are still many people who are still blissfully unaware of how the current financial system works and don’t understand what Bitcoin (BTC) and Crypto really mean for society. This isn’t meant to be a “I told you so” moment, I say this because of the people who have actually entered the space and have already begun to understand how well incentivised systems work.

If you are one of these people, well done, you are still early and the laser eye - initial $100k target is well within sight.

I say initial, because I see the price of BTC going much higher. There will come a time when we price satoshi’s and not a whole coin. For future and longer term projections, I’d highly recommend you look at the great work PlanB has done in this space with the BTC Stock to Flow (S2F) model.

Back to the main question, how do we get there? As I mentioned, I believe it is inevitable, when we look at Ethereum (ETH) in closer detail, it gives us a clue on how we achieve the milestone.

Do you remember how many ETH were required to become an “ETH2.0 Validator Node”? The answer is 32. The first stage (Beacon Chain) went live on 1st Dec 2020 (closed trading at $586 on the day). So a full node (32 ETH) would have cost you $18752. Do you know what BTC closed at on the 1st Dec 2020, the answer is $18771.

Therefore, on the day that ETH2.0 went live, 32ETH = 1BTC.

The chart below (Fig1) shows this 32:1 ratio on go-live day, also very interesting is the volume profile (volume by price), notice how the point of control (POC) is 32. This basically means that most volume in this series was done at 32:1 ratio. In this chart, it appears that BTC is currently undervalued compared to ETH.

Next let us have a look at the price of 32ETH. In Fig2, you will see that on the 1st Dec 2020 the price was $18742, as stated above. It has climbed to over $100k in early May 2021 and currently the price of an “ETH2.0 Validator Node” (32 ETH) is back over $100k.

Next, lets look at the 4 year ratio of 1BTC / ETH2.0 Validator Node (i.e. 32 ETH). In Fig3, pay close attention to the POC value. It is 1, confirming again that the ratio of 32:1 is highly significant and that BTC is currently under valued relative to ETH.

Next you might ask, how undervalued is BTC relative to ETH. For that we use Fig4. Here we simply subtract the price of 32 ETH by 1 BTC. When the beacon chain went live the difference between the two assets that cost over $18k was only $29, today it is over $57k.

The log view of the above chart, see Fig5, suggest that we can expect the 32:1 ratio to be tested again and again in the future as it has been in the past. With all this said we can do the projection in the reverse. I.e. we can take the price of BTC as the constant and we can project that the price of ETH should fall to ~ $1450 (BTC at ~$46500 / 32).

This is however not what we set out to do. We set out to show how BTC could get to $100k. From the charts and analysis above I think we can agree that the ratio of 32:1 is very important. That BTC appears undervalued relative to ETH. With ETH2.0 staking, burning of ETH as result of “London” upgrade and DeFi draining ETH from exchanges, do you really see the price of ETH falling too far from here. That said 32 ETH is over 100k, so a little catch up from BTC will get us there too!

Laser eyes aren’t that silly after all.

As fun as it is posting gifs and calling crypto to the moon, we prefer to provide topical analysis and alpha. If you find this blog useful, why not copy our crypto strategy, Rational Active Allocation, with as little as €10. If that’s not for you, maybe look at dollar cost averaging (DCA) every month into a gold strategy XAU DCA Strategy (Gold). Either way, we can only continue to do this with your support, if you haven’t signed up for our free newsletter, you can do that here.

This blog is dedicated to my mate “pigeon”

DISCLAIMER:

This publication is general in nature and is not intended to constitute any professional advice or an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any financial or investment products. You should seek separate professional advice before taking any action in relation to the matters dealt with in this publication. Please also note our disclosure here